Redmi 3S vs Samsung Galaxy A17

The Redmi 3S (2016) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 430, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; estimated prices are $120 and $147. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A17 leads — 27/100 vs 12/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A17 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4100); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy A17 is faster in AnTuTu (602,971 vs 180,440); the Samsung Galaxy A17 has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 3S doesn't; the Redmi 3S is noticeably lighter (144g vs 190g).

The Samsung Galaxy A17 is noticeably better than the Redmi 3S — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Redmi 3S
Performance 0
Display 0
Camera 0
Battery 14
Design 100
Value for money 100
Samsung Galaxy A17
Performance 0
Display 50
Camera 28
Battery 37
Design 62
Value for money 100
What makes Redmi 3S better?
  • Lighter: 144g vs 190g
  • Cheaper: $120 vs $147

  • Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 62/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy A17 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 602971 vs 180440
  • Better Geekbench Single: 760 vs 205
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 1890 vs 827
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4100 mAh
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 90Hz vs 60Hz

  • Better camera (28/100 vs 0/100)
  • Longer battery life (37/100 vs 14/100)
  • Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Redmi 3S vs the Samsung Galaxy A17, the Samsung Galaxy A17 scores 15 points higher (27/100 vs 12/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 leads (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 leads (37/100 vs 14/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (28/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (37/100 vs 14/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 3S significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (100/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

Redmi 3S: The Redmi 3S is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy A17: The Samsung Galaxy A17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Redmi 3S Samsung Galaxy A17
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 MediaTek Helio G99
AnTuTu 180440 602971
Geekbench Single 205 760
Geekbench Multi 827 1890
Display 5.0" IPS LCD 6.7" Super AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340
Refresh rate 60 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 4100 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 25W
Main camera 13 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 5 MP
Front camera 5 MP 13 MP
RAM 2GB / 3GB 4GB / 6GB / 8GB
Storage 16GB / 32GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 15 / One UI 7
Brightness (peak) 800 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP54
Dimensions 139.3×69.6×8.5 mm 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm
Weight 144 g 190 g
Price $120 $147
Camera comparison
Redmi 3S
  • Main: 13MP
  • Front: 5MP
0
camera
Samsung Galaxy A17
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 5MP
  • Front: 13MP
28
camera
Display comparison
Redmi 3S
  • 5.0" IPS LCD
  • Refresh rate: 60 Hz
0
display
Samsung Galaxy A17
  • 6.7" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
50
display
Battery and charging
Redmi 3S
  • 4100 mAh
  • No wireless charging
14
battery
Samsung Galaxy A17
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
37
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Redmi 3S and Samsung Galaxy A17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Redmi 3S Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
12/100
180440 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy A17 MediaTek Helio G99
27/100 +70.1%
602971 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy A17 leads Redmi 3S by 70.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Redmi 3S
$120
Samsung Galaxy A17
$147

Price difference: $27. Redmi 3S is cheaper by $27.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 significantly outperforms the Redmi 3S (50/100 vs 0/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (28/100 vs 0/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 notably outperforms the Redmi 3S (37/100 vs 14/100).

design

In the "design" category, the Redmi 3S significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy A17 (100/100 vs 62/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Redmi 3S or the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Samsung Galaxy A17 is noticeably better than the Redmi 3S — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Redmi 3S and the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Redmi 3S has a MobileRank rating of 12/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 — 27/100.

Which has the better camera: the Redmi 3S or the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Samsung Galaxy A17 leads on camera score (28/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Redmi 3S over the Samsung Galaxy A17?

The Redmi 3S is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.