Realme C65 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A17
The Realme C65 4G (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99; estimated prices are $125 and $147. Both devices score the same overall rating of 27/100. Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A17 is faster in AnTuTu (602,971 vs 346,495).
Realme C65 4G
Samsung Galaxy A17
- Faster charging: 45W vs 25W
- Lighter: 185g vs 190g
- Cheaper: $125 vs $147
- Longer battery life (42/100 vs 37/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (68/100 vs 62/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 602971 vs 346495
- Better Geekbench Single: 760 vs 420
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1890 vs 1364
- Better camera (28/100 vs 24/100)
The Realme C65 4G and the Samsung Galaxy A17 received the same MobileRank rating — 27/100. In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 and the Realme C65 4G are nearly equal (28/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (42/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (68/100 vs 62/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
| Specification | Realme C65 4G | Samsung Galaxy A17 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | 346495 | 602971 | |
| Geekbench Single | 420 | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1364 | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1604 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI 5.0 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 625 nits | 800 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 164.6×76.1×7.6 mm | 164.4×77.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 185 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $125 | $147 |
Realme C65 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy A17
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Realme C65 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1604
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A17
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Realme C65 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A17
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
We compared Realme C65 4G and Samsung Galaxy A17, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy A17 leads Realme C65 4G by 42.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $22. Realme C65 4G is cheaper by $22.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 and the Realme C65 4G are nearly equal (28/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (42/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Realme C65 4G is a bit better (68/100 vs 62/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
Which is better: the Realme C65 4G or the Samsung Galaxy A17?
Both devices scored 27/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Samsung Galaxy A17.
What is the rating of the Realme C65 4G and the Samsung Galaxy A17?
The Realme C65 4G has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 — 27/100.
Should you choose the Realme C65 4G over the Samsung Galaxy A17?
The Realme C65 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy A17 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.