Redmi 13C 4G vs Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
The Redmi 13C 4G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 1330; estimated prices are $130 and $166. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G leads — 48/100 vs 39/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is faster in AnTuTu (602,971 vs 552,286).
Redmi 13C 4G
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2047 vs 1963
- Cheaper: $130 vs $166
- Overall rating 39/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 602971 vs 552286
- Better Geekbench Single: 952 vs 727
- Faster charging: 25W vs 10W
- Higher performance (47/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (33/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (67/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Redmi 13C 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G scores 9 points higher (48/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Redmi 13C 4G are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (67/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Redmi 13C 4G are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Redmi 13C 4G | Samsung Galaxy A17 5G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | Samsung Exynos 1330 | |
| AnTuTu | 552286 | 602971 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 952 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 1963 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" Super AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 14 | Android 15 / One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Weight | — | 192 g | |
| Price | $130 | $166 |
Redmi 13C 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 13MP
Redmi 13C 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- 6.7" Super AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Redmi 13C 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Redmi 13C 4G and Samsung Galaxy A17 5G, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy A17 5G leads Redmi 13C 4G by 8.4% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $36. Redmi 13C 4G is cheaper by $36.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Redmi 13C 4G are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (67/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G and the Redmi 13C 4G are nearly equal (33/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Redmi 13C 4G or the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G edges out the Redmi 13C 4G by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Redmi 13C 4G and the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Redmi 13C 4G has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G — 48/100.
Should you choose the Redmi 13C 4G over the Samsung Galaxy A17 5G?
The Redmi 13C 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy A17 5G is a better fit for everyday use.