Redmi 13C 4G vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
The Redmi 13C 4G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; estimated prices are $130 and $2199. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads — 71/100 vs 25/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 408,000); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 13C 4G doesn't.
Redmi 13C 4G
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Cheaper: $130 vs $2199
- Better design/ergonomics (50/100 vs 31/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 408000
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 760
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 1890
- Faster charging: 60W vs 10W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (64/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Redmi 13C 4G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 46 points higher (71/100 vs 25/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (64/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 13C 4G leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (92/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (64/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (51/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Redmi 13C 4G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (50/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 13C 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (100/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Redmi 13C 4G | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 408000 | 3942923 | |
| Geekbench Single | 760 | 3640 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1890 | 11033 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1968x2184 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 60W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 14 | Android 16 / One UI 8.5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Weight | — | 215 g | |
| Price | $130 | $2199 |
Redmi 13C 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Redmi 13C 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1968x2184
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi 13C 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- Wireless: 25W
We compared Redmi 13C 4G and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads Redmi 13C 4G by 89.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2069. Redmi 13C 4G is cheaper by $2069.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (92/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (64/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (51/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi 13C 4G notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (50/100 vs 31/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi 13C 4G significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (100/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Redmi 13C 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G by 46 points (71/100 vs 25/100).
What is the rating of the Redmi 13C 4G and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Redmi 13C 4G has a MobileRank rating of 25/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Redmi 13C 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on camera score (64/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Redmi 13C 4G or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Redmi 13C 4G over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?
The Redmi 13C 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.