Redmi 13C 4G vs Tecno Spark 50 Pro
The Redmi 13C 4G (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Tecno Spark 50 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate; estimated prices are $130 and $160. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Spark 50 Pro leads — 45/100 vs 39/100 (a 6-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Spark 50 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Tecno Spark 50 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (576,015 vs 552,286); the Tecno Spark 50 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Redmi 13C 4G doesn't.
Redmi 13C 4G
Tecno Spark 50 Pro
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2047 vs 2014
- Cheaper: $130 vs $160
- Overall rating 39/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 576015 vs 552286
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 60W vs 10W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (44/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (59/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (55/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Redmi 13C 4G vs the Tecno Spark 50 Pro, the Tecno Spark 50 Pro scores 6 points higher (45/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 Pro leads (59/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Tecno Spark 50 Pro and the Redmi 13C 4G are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark 50 Pro is a bit better (55/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 Pro notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (59/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Redmi 13C 4G | Tecno Spark 50 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | MediaTek Helio G100 Ultimate | |
| AnTuTu | 552286 | 576015 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 727 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 2014 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 60W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 12, MIUI 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 167.8×79.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | — | 195 g | |
| Price | $130 | $160 |
Redmi 13C 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Tecno Spark 50 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Redmi 13C 4G
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Tecno Spark 50 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi 13C 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Spark 50 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 60W
- No wireless charging
We compared Redmi 13C 4G and Tecno Spark 50 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Tecno Spark 50 Pro leads Redmi 13C 4G by 4.1% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $30. Redmi 13C 4G is cheaper by $30.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Tecno Spark 50 Pro and the Redmi 13C 4G are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Tecno Spark 50 Pro is a bit better (55/100 vs 44/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Tecno Spark 50 Pro notably outperforms the Redmi 13C 4G (59/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Redmi 13C 4G or the Tecno Spark 50 Pro?
The Tecno Spark 50 Pro edges out the Redmi 13C 4G by just 6 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Redmi 13C 4G and the Tecno Spark 50 Pro?
The Redmi 13C 4G has a MobileRank rating of 39/100, the Tecno Spark 50 Pro — 45/100.
Should you choose the Redmi 13C 4G over the Tecno Spark 50 Pro?
The Redmi 13C 4G is a better fit for everyday use. The Tecno Spark 50 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.