Realme Narzo 100x vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Realme Narzo 100x (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $205 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 46/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Realme Narzo 100x has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 528,398); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme Narzo 100x doesn't; the Realme Narzo 100x is noticeably lighter (224g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Realme Narzo 100x
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Realme Narzo 100x better?
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5600 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 224g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $205 vs $2899
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 63/100)
- Better portability (36/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 528398
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1980
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 65/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Realme Narzo 100x vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 23 points higher (69/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). Value score: Realme Narzo 100x — 52/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 100x (90/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 100x (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 100x and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme Narzo 100x notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (36/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Realme Narzo 100x | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 528398 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 720x1570 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 166.4×78.2×8.8 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 224 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $205 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Realme Narzo 100x
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Realme Narzo 100x
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1570
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Realme Narzo 100x
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Realme Narzo 100x and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Realme Narzo 100x by 81.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2694. Realme Narzo 100x was $2694 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 100x (90/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 65/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Realme Narzo 100x (52/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme Narzo 100x and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (64/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme Narzo 100x notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (36/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Realme Narzo 100x or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Realme Narzo 100x by 23 points (69/100 vs 46/100).
What is the rating of the Realme Narzo 100x and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Realme Narzo 100x has a MobileRank rating of 46/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Realme Narzo 100x or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Realme Narzo 100x or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Realme Narzo 100x over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.