Realme C61 vs Vivo X300s
The Realme C61 (2024) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T612, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $156 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 30/100 (a 59-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the Realme C61 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 217g).
Realme C61
Vivo X300s
- Lighter: 188g vs 217g
- Cheaper: $156 vs $723
- Better portability (68/100 vs 42/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 360
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 1250
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 16/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 43/100)
- Better value for money (90/100 vs 34/100)
Comparing the Realme C61 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 59 points higher (89/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (94/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s leads (90/100 vs 34/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (94/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (94/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (83/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme C61 notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (68/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (90/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Realme C61 | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc Tiger T612 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 360 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1250 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 560 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Protection | IP54 | — | |
| Dimensions | 167.3×76.7×7.8 mm | — | |
| Weight | 188 g | 217 g | |
| Price | $156 | $723 |
Realme C61
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Realme C61
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Realme C61
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Price difference: $567. Realme C61 is cheaper by $567.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (94/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (94/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (83/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme C61 notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (68/100 vs 42/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (90/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Realme C61 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Realme C61 by 59 points (89/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Realme C61 and the Vivo X300s?
The Realme C61 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the Realme C61 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (94/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Realme C61 over the Vivo X300s?
The Realme C61 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.