Realme C61 vs Vivo iQOO 13
The Realme C61 (2024) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T612, while the Vivo iQOO 13 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads — 84/100 vs 30/100 (a 54-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 13 has the bigger battery (6150 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 13 has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme C61 doesn't; the Realme C61 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 207g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Realme C61
Vivo iQOO 13
What makes Realme C61 better?
- Lighter: 188g vs 207g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 55/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 13 better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 360
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 1250
- Bigger battery: 6150 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 16/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Realme C61 vs the Vivo iQOO 13, the Vivo iQOO 13 scores 54 points higher (84/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (91/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 leads (73/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (91/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (73/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme C61 is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Realme C61 | Vivo iQOO 13 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc Tiger T612 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3150555 | |
| Geekbench Single | 360 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1250 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6150 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 120W | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI | Android 15, OriginOS 5 (China) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 560 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 167.3×76.7×7.8 mm | 163.4×76.7×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 207 g | |
| Launch price | — | $650 |
Camera comparison
Realme C61
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO 13
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Realme C61
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Realme C61
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 13
- 6150 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 14:22 hrs, total 30:28 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Realme C61
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (91/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (99/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (73/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme C61 is a bit better (68/100 vs 55/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Realme C61 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 significantly outperforms the Realme C61 by 54 points (84/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Realme C61 and the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Realme C61 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo iQOO 13 — 84/100.
Which is more powerful: the Realme C61 or the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 leads on performance (91/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Realme C61 over the Vivo iQOO 13?
The Vivo iQOO 13 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.