Realme C61 vs Vivo iQOO 15T
The Realme C61 (2024) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T612, while the Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 30/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo iQOO 15T has NFC for contactless payments, the Realme C61 doesn't; the Realme C61 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 216g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Realme C61
Vivo iQOO 15T
What makes Realme C61 better?
- Lighter: 188g vs 216g
- Better portability (68/100 vs 44/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 15T better?
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 360
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1250
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 15W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 16/100)
- Longer battery life (75/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Realme C61 vs the Vivo iQOO 15T, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 52 points higher (82/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (97/100 vs 16/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (97/100 vs 16/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (99/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (75/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme C61 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (68/100 vs 44/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Realme C61 | Vivo iQOO 15T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc Tiger T612 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 4704310 | |
| Geekbench Single | 360 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1250 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 15W | 100W | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, Realme UI | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 560 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP54 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 167.3×76.7×7.8 mm | — | |
| Weight | 188 g | 216 g | |
| Launch price | — | $499 |
Camera comparison
Realme C61
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO 15T
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Realme C61
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Realme C61
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Realme C61
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (97/100 vs 16/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (99/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Realme C61 (75/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Realme C61 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (68/100 vs 44/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Realme C61 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the Realme C61 by 52 points (82/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Realme C61 and the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Realme C61 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo iQOO 15T — 82/100.
Which is more powerful: the Realme C61 or the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on performance (97/100 vs 16/100).
Should you choose the Realme C61 over the Vivo iQOO 15T?
The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.