Realme 16T vs Vivo Y300 (China)
The Realme 16T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300, while the Vivo Y300 (China) (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Realme 16T leads — 35/100 vs 31/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Realme 16T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 6500).
Realme 16T
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Better camera (27/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (60/100 vs 54/100)
- Better value for money (96/100 vs 55/100)
- Overall rating 31/100
Comparing the Realme 16T vs the Vivo Y300 (China), the Realme 16T scores 4 points higher (35/100 vs 31/100). In the "value for money" category, the Realme 16T leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Realme 16T and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Realme 16T is a bit better (60/100 vs 54/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "value for money" category, the Realme 16T significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (96/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Realme 16T | Vivo Y300 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 524785 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 771 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1980 | 1980 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2392 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15, OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1200 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 8.9×None×None mm | 163.6×76.2×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | — | 200 g | |
| Price | $200 | — |
Realme 16T
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y300 (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Realme 16T
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Realme 16T
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 (China)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
We compared Realme 16T and Vivo Y300 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Vivo Y300 (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Realme 16T and the Vivo Y300 (China) are nearly equal (27/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Realme 16T is a bit better (60/100 vs 54/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Realme 16T significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 (China) (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Realme 16T or the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Realme 16T edges out the Vivo Y300 (China) by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Realme 16T and the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Realme 16T has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Vivo Y300 (China) — 31/100.
Should you choose the Realme 16T over the Vivo Y300 (China)?
The Realme 16T is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo Y300 (China) is a better fit for everyday use.