Realme 14 Pro+ vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Realme 14 Pro+ (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $350 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 65/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,107,631); the Realme 14 Pro+ is noticeably lighter (191g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 14 Pro+ by 26 points (91/100 vs 65/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Realme 14 Pro+

Performance 61
Display 84
Camera 61
Battery 63
Portability 68
Value for money 64

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Realme 14 Pro+ better?

  • Lighter: 191g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $350 vs $950

  • Better portability (68/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1107631
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1161
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3390
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 61/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Realme 14 Pro+ vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 26 points higher (91/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Realme 14 Pro+ — 64/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 14 Pro+ (99/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 14 Pro+ (96/100 vs 61/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme 14 Pro+ (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Realme 14 Pro+ notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (68/100 vs 39/100).

Realme 14 Pro+: The Realme 14 Pro+ is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Realme 14 Pro+ Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1107631 4247433
Geekbench Single 1161 3639
Geekbench Multi 3390 11047
Display 6.8" OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1272x2800 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15, Realme UI 6.0 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1500 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 8.0×None×None mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 191 g 230 g
Launch price $350 $950

Camera comparison

Realme 14 Pro+

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
61
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Realme 14 Pro+

  • 6.8" OLED
  • Resolution: 1272x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Realme 14 Pro+

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
63
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Realme 14 Pro+ and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Realme 14 Pro+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
65/100
1107631 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +73.9%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Realme 14 Pro+ by 73.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Realme 14 Pro+

$350

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Launch price difference: $600. Realme 14 Pro+ was $600 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 14 Pro+ (99/100 vs 61/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 14 Pro+ (96/100 vs 61/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Realme 14 Pro+ (85/100 vs 63/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Realme 14 Pro+ notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (68/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Realme 14 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Realme 14 Pro+ by 26 points (91/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Realme 14 Pro+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Realme 14 Pro+ has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Realme 14 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 61/100).

Which is more powerful: the Realme 14 Pro+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 61/100).

Should you choose the Realme 14 Pro+ over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Realme 14 Pro+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.