Poco F7 vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $399 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 66/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 2,199,079).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F7
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Poco F7 better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Lighter: 215g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $399 vs $889
- Better portability (48/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 2199079
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2072
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 6649
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 80/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 68/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 83/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F7 vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 20 points higher (86/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 68/100). Value score: Poco F7 — 60/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 80/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (93/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (48/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F7 | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2199079 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2072 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6649 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2712x1220 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 215 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $399 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Poco F7
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Poco F7
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F7
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F7 and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Poco F7 by 28.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $490. Poco F7 was $490 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 80/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 83/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (93/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (48/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F7 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F7 by 20 points (86/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F7 and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Poco F7 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 80/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.