Poco F7 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $499 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 67/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 2,301,212); the Poco F7 Pro is noticeably lighter (206g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F7 Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
- Lighter: 206g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $889
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 2301212
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 2203
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 6511
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 82/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 65/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F7 Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 19 points higher (86/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Poco F7 Pro — 56/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (93/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (54/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F7 Pro | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2301212 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2203 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6511 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 206 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $499 | $889 |
Camera comparison
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F7 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Poco F7 Pro by 25.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $390. Poco F7 Pro was $390 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (93/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 65/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (54/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F7 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra is noticeably better than the Poco F7 Pro — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Poco F7 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.