Poco F7 Ultra vs Vivo S16e
The Poco F7 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo S16e (2022) runs on the Exynos 1080. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Ultra leads — 82/100 vs 49/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Ultra has the bigger battery (5300 mAh vs 4600); the Vivo S16e is noticeably lighter (187g vs 212g).
Poco F7 Ultra
Vivo S16e
- Bigger battery: 5300 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 66W
- Better camera (71/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (84/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 80/100)
- Lighter: 187g vs 212g
- Better portability (70/100 vs 48/100)
Comparing the Poco F7 Ultra vs the Vivo S16e, the Poco F7 Ultra scores 33 points higher (82/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (71/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra leads (84/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16e (71/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16e (84/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16e notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (70/100 vs 48/100).
| Specification | Poco F7 Ultra | Vivo S16e | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Exynos 1080 | |
| AnTuTu | 3060993 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | — | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5300 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 66W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 32 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 11, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.3×75.0×8.4 mm | 162.5×75.8×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 212 g | 187 g | |
| Launch price | $500 | — |
Poco F7 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo S16e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco F7 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S16e
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F7 Ultra
- 5300 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:39 hrs, total 26:17 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo S16e
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo S16e
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16e (71/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16e (84/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16e notably outperforms the Poco F7 Ultra (70/100 vs 48/100).
Which is better: the Poco F7 Ultra or the Vivo S16e?
The Poco F7 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16e by 33 points (82/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F7 Ultra and the Vivo S16e?
The Poco F7 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Vivo S16e — 49/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 Ultra or the Vivo S16e?
The Poco F7 Ultra leads on camera score (71/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 Ultra over the Vivo S16e?
The Poco F7 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo S16e is a better fit for everyday use.