Poco F7 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

The Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $499 and $892. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 67/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 6000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 2,301,212); the Poco F7 Pro is noticeably lighter (206g vs 224g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro by 20 points (87/100 vs 67/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Poco F7 Pro

Performance 82
Display 90
Camera 37
Battery 65
Portability 54
Value for money 56

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 88

What makes Poco F7 Pro better?

  • Lighter: 206g vs 224g
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $892

  • Better display (90/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 2301212
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2203
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6511
  • Bigger battery: 6800 vs 6000 mAh

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 82/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 37/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 65/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco F7 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 20 points higher (87/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 82/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 65/100). Value score: Poco F7 Pro — 56/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (98/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (83/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 42/100).

Poco F7 Pro: The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China): The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Poco F7 Pro Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2301212 3950082
Geekbench Single 2203 3639
Geekbench Multi 6511 11047
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 3200x1440 1200x2608
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 6800 mAh
Charging 90W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 20 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3200 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 206 g 224 g
Launch price $499 $892

Camera comparison

Poco F7 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Poco F7 Pro

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Poco F7 Pro

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
65
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Poco F7 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco F7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
67/100
2301212 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +41.7%
3950082 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Poco F7 Pro by 41.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Poco F7 Pro

$499

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

$892

Launch price difference: $393. Poco F7 Pro was $393 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (98/100 vs 82/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (87/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (83/100 vs 65/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (54/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Poco F7 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Poco F7 Pro by 20 points (87/100 vs 67/100).

What is the rating of the Poco F7 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Poco F7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 67/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 82/100).

Should you choose the Poco F7 Pro over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.