Poco F4 GT vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Poco F4 GT (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $600 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 60/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,303,229); the Poco F4 GT is noticeably lighter (210g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F4 GT
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Poco F4 GT better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
- Lighter: 210g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $899
- Better portability (47/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1303229
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4700 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 58/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F4 GT vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 28 points higher (88/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 58/100). Value score: Poco F4 GT — 34/100, Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F4 GT (94/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT (96/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F4 GT (81/100 vs 58/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco F4 GT and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F4 GT | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 1303229 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1662 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4188 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2400x1080 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×76.7×8.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Poco F4 GT
- Main: 64MP f/1.79
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco F4 GT
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F4 GT
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F4 GT and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Poco F4 GT by 60.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $299. Poco F4 GT was $299 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F4 GT (94/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT (96/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Poco F4 GT (81/100 vs 58/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco F4 GT and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (47/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F4 GT or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco F4 GT by 28 points (88/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Poco F4 GT and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Poco F4 GT has a MobileRank rating of 60/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F4 GT or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F4 GT or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Poco F4 GT over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Poco F4 GT is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.