Poco C95 Pro vs Vivo X Fold6
The Poco C95 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $253 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 38/100 (a 50-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C95 Pro has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6900); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 354,158); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.8mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C95 Pro
Vivo X Fold6
What makes Poco C95 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6900 mAh
- Cheaper at launch: $253 vs $1900
- Overall rating 38/100
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 354158
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 405
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1407
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 62/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C95 Pro vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 50 points higher (88/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (95/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 62/100). Value score: Poco C95 Pro — 26/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (95/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (82/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (100/100 vs 32/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C95 Pro | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 354158 | 3455738 | |
| Geekbench Single | 405 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1407 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.1×78.4×8.8 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 232 g | — | |
| Launch price | $253 | $1900 |
Camera comparison
Poco C95 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Display comparison
Poco C95 Pro
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C95 Pro
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C95 Pro and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads Poco C95 Pro by 89.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1647. Poco C95 Pro was $1647 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (95/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (81/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (87/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (82/100 vs 62/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (100/100 vs 32/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro by 50 points (88/100 vs 38/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C95 Pro and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Poco C95 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (95/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Poco C95 Pro over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.