Poco C95 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
The Poco C95 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M; launch prices were $253 and $548. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 38/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 7500); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 354,158).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C95 Pro
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
What makes Poco C95 Pro better?
- Cheaper at launch: $253 vs $548
- Overall rating 38/100
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 354158
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 405
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1407
- Bigger battery: 9100 vs 7500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 225g vs 232g
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (35/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 62/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better portability (38/100 vs 32/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C95 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 37 points higher (75/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 29/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 62/100). Value score: Poco C95 Pro — 26/100, Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (95/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (80/100 vs 62/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (38/100 vs 32/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C95 Pro | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G91 Ultra | MediaTek Dimensity 9500M | |
| AnTuTu | 354158 | 3579952 | |
| Geekbench Single | 405 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1407 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPS AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1440x3200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 9100 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 170.1×78.4×8.8 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 232 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $253 | $548 |
Camera comparison
Poco C95 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.88
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Poco C95 Pro
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3200
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C95 Pro
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra
- 9100 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C95 Pro and Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Poco C95 Pro by 90.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $295. Poco C95 Pro was $295 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (95/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (99/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (35/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Poco C95 Pro (80/100 vs 62/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (38/100 vs 32/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C95 Pro by 37 points (75/100 vs 38/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C95 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Poco C95 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on camera score (35/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C95 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Poco C95 Pro over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.