Poco C75 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

The Poco C75 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 37/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C75 has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is faster in AnTuTu (1,290,942 vs 358,383).

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Poco C75 by 34 points (71/100 vs 37/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C75
Performance 30
Display 55
Camera 31
Battery 46
Portability 55
Value for money
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Performance 69
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 56
Portability 52
Value for money
What makes Poco C75 better?
  • Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh

  • Better portability (55/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1290942 vs 358383
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4453 vs 1416
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (69/100 vs 30/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 31/100)
  • Longer battery life (56/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco C75 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 34 points higher (71/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (69/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (69/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Poco C75 (80/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (86/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C75 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).

Poco C75: The Poco C75 is a better fit for everyday use.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco C75 ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Processor MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 358383 1290942
Geekbench Single 432 1675
Geekbench Multi 1416 4453
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1640 1116x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5160 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 18W 80W
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 13 MP 16 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 18GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, HyperOS Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 600 nits 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Dimensions 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 204 g 204 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Poco C75
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
31
camera
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera
Display comparison
Poco C75
  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Poco C75
  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco C75 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco C75 MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
37/100
358383 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 +72.2%
1290942 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads Poco C75 by 72.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (69/100 vs 30/100).

display

In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Poco C75 (80/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (86/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco C75 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C75 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Poco C75 by 34 points (71/100 vs 37/100).

What is the rating of the Poco C75 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Poco C75 has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco C75 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco C75 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on performance (69/100 vs 30/100).

Should you choose the Poco C75 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Poco C75 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.