Poco C75 vs ZTE Axon 40
The Poco C75 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 37/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C75 has the bigger battery (5160 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the ZTE Axon 40 is faster in AnTuTu (1,010,069 vs 358,383).
Poco C75
ZTE Axon 40
- Bigger battery: 5160 vs 5000 mAh
- Better portability (55/100 vs 53/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 1010069 vs 358383
- Better Geekbench Single: 1298 vs 432
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3520 vs 1416
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 200g vs 204g
- Higher performance (61/100 vs 30/100)
- Better camera (51/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (73/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Poco C75 vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 21 points higher (58/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (61/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 leads (51/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (61/100 vs 30/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Poco C75 (73/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Poco C75 (51/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C75 and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Poco C75 | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 358383 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 432 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1416 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 14, HyperOS | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Poco C75
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Poco C75
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C75
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco C75 and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
ZTE Axon 40 leads Poco C75 by 64.5% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (61/100 vs 30/100).
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Poco C75 (73/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 notably outperforms the Poco C75 (51/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C75 and the ZTE Axon 40 are nearly equal (55/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Poco C75 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 by 21 points (58/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C75 and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Poco C75 has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C75 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C75 or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on performance (61/100 vs 30/100).
Should you choose the Poco C75 over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Poco C75 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.