Poco F7 Pro vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Poco F7 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 Pro leads — 80/100 vs 71/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 Pro has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Poco F7 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (2,301,212 vs 1,294,871); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is noticeably lighter (204g vs 220g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco F7 Pro
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
What makes Poco F7 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2301212 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 80W
- Higher performance (87/100 vs 68/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 80/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 204g vs 220g
- Better camera (86/100 vs 67/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco F7 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Poco F7 Pro scores 9 points higher (80/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro leads (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (87/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (86/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (87/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco F7 Pro | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 2301212 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 32 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3200 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 160.3×75.0×8.1 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 220 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | $499 | — |
Camera comparison
Poco F7 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 32MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Poco F7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco F7 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:00 hrs, total 28:39 hrs
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless: 50W
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Poco F7 Pro and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F7 Pro leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 77.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (87/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F7 Pro is a bit better (90/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Poco F7 Pro (86/100 vs 67/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (87/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco F7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Poco F7 Pro edges out the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco F7 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Poco F7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco F7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 67/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco F7 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Poco F7 Pro leads on performance (87/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Poco F7 Pro over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Poco F7 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.