Poco C75 vs Redmi Turbo 5

The Poco C75 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra, while the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra; estimated prices are $116 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads — 54/100 vs 32/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the Redmi Turbo 5 has the bigger battery (7560 mAh vs 5160); the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,809,170 vs 358,383).

The Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 by 22 points (54/100 vs 32/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C75
Performance 0
Display 100
Camera 26
Battery 40
Design 45
Value for money 100
Redmi Turbo 5
Performance 43
Display 100
Camera 32
Battery 72
Design 45
Value for money 93
What makes Poco C75 better?
  • Cheaper: $116 vs $250

  • Better value for money (100/100 vs 93/100)
What makes Redmi Turbo 5 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 2809170 vs 358383
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1553 vs 432
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6403 vs 1416
  • Bigger battery: 7560 vs 5160 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 18W

  • Higher performance (43/100 vs 0/100)
  • Better camera (32/100 vs 26/100)
  • Longer battery life (72/100 vs 40/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Poco C75 vs the Redmi Turbo 5, the Redmi Turbo 5 scores 22 points higher (54/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (72/100 vs 40/100). In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (43/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (32/100 vs 26/100). In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (72/100 vs 40/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 45/100. In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 is a bit better (100/100 vs 93/100).

Poco C75: The Poco C75 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Redmi Turbo 5: The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Poco C75 Redmi Turbo 5
Processor MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra
AnTuTu 358383 2809170
Geekbench Single 432 1553
Geekbench Multi 1416 6403
Display 6.9" IPS LCD 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 720x1640 2756x1268
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5160 mAh 7560 mAh
Charging 18W 100W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 13 MP 20 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 14, HyperOS Android 16
Brightness (peak) 600 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm
Weight 204 g 204 g
Price $116 $250
Camera comparison
Poco C75
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
26
camera
Redmi Turbo 5
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
32
camera
Display comparison
Poco C75
  • 6.9" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Redmi Turbo 5
  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2756x1268
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
100
display
Battery and charging
Poco C75
  • 5160 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
40
battery
Redmi Turbo 5
  • 7560 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
72
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Poco C75 and Redmi Turbo 5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Poco C75 MediaTek Helio G81 Ultra
32/100
358383 AnTuTu
Redmi Turbo 5 MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra
54/100 +87.2%
2809170 AnTuTu

Redmi Turbo 5 leads Poco C75 by 87.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Poco C75
$116
Redmi Turbo 5
$250

Price difference: $134. Poco C75 is cheaper by $134.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (43/100 vs 0/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 is a bit better (32/100 vs 26/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 (72/100 vs 40/100).

design

In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 45/100.

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Poco C75 is a bit better (100/100 vs 93/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C75 or the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Redmi Turbo 5 significantly outperforms the Poco C75 by 22 points (54/100 vs 32/100).

What is the rating of the Poco C75 and the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Poco C75 has a MobileRank rating of 32/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 54/100.

Which has the better camera: the Poco C75 or the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on camera score (32/100 vs 26/100).

Which is more powerful: the Poco C75 or the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Redmi Turbo 5 leads on performance (43/100 vs 0/100).

Should you choose the Poco C75 over the Redmi Turbo 5?

The Poco C75 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.