Poco F8 vs Redmi Turbo 5
The Poco F8 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Redmi Turbo 5 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra; estimated prices are $499 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 leads — 61/100 vs 54/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 7560); the Redmi Turbo 5 is faster in AnTuTu (2,809,170 vs 2,760,000).
Poco F8
Redmi Turbo 5
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1553
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 6403
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 7560 mAh
- Higher performance (65/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2809170 vs 2760000
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Lighter: 204g vs 205g
- Cheaper: $250 vs $499
- Better design/ergonomics (45/100 vs 43/100)
- Better value for money (93/100 vs 75/100)
Comparing the Poco F8 vs the Redmi Turbo 5, the Poco F8 scores 7 points higher (61/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 leads (65/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 leads (93/100 vs 75/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (65/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 32/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 72/100. In the "design" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Poco F8 are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Poco F8 (93/100 vs 75/100).
| Specification | Poco F8 | Redmi Turbo 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 2760000 | 2809170 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 1553 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 6403 | |
| Display | 6.6" OLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3200x1440 | 2756x1268 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 7560 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 20 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | — | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 157.5×75.2×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | 204 g | |
| Price | $499 | $250 |
Poco F8
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Redmi Turbo 5
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Poco F8
- 6.6" OLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Redmi Turbo 5
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F8
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Redmi Turbo 5
- 7560 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco F8 and Redmi Turbo 5, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Redmi Turbo 5 leads Poco F8 by 1.8% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $249. Redmi Turbo 5 is cheaper by $249.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Redmi Turbo 5 (65/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 32/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 72/100.
design
In the "design" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 and the Poco F8 are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Redmi Turbo 5 notably outperforms the Poco F8 (93/100 vs 75/100).
Which is better: the Poco F8 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Poco F8 edges out the Redmi Turbo 5 by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Poco F8 and the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Poco F8 has a MobileRank rating of 61/100, the Redmi Turbo 5 — 54/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco F8 or the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Poco F8 leads on performance (65/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Poco F8 over the Redmi Turbo 5?
The Poco F8 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers. The Redmi Turbo 5 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.