Poco C75 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
The Poco C75 5G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads — 88/100 vs 42/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 5160); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,998,145 vs 506,757); the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C75 5G doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C75 5G
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
What makes Poco C75 5G better?
- Lighter: 212g vs 219g
- Better portability (50/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro Max better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3998145 vs 506757
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 838
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1899
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 5160 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 18W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (89/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C75 5G vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max scores 46 points higher (88/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (98/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads (89/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (98/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Poco C75 5G (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (87/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (89/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C75 5G and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (50/100 vs 48/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C75 5G | Xiaomi 17 Pro Max | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 506757 | 3998145 | |
| Geekbench Single | 838 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1899 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 159 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 212 g | 219 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Poco C75 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- Main: 50MP f/1.69
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Poco C75 5G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C75 5G
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- 7500 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:28 hrs, total 36:26 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C75 5G and Xiaomi 17 Pro Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads Poco C75 5G by 87.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco C75 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (98/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max notably outperforms the Poco C75 5G (81/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (87/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (89/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C75 5G and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max are nearly equal (50/100 vs 48/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C75 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G by 46 points (88/100 vs 42/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C75 5G and the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Poco C75 5G has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C75 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on camera score (87/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C75 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max leads on performance (98/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Poco C75 5G over the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max?
The Xiaomi 17 Pro Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.