Poco C75 5G vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Poco C75 5G (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 42/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5160); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,667,711 vs 506,757); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C75 5G doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C75 5G
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Poco C75 5G better?
- Lighter: 212g vs 226g
- Better portability (50/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3667711 vs 506757
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 838
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 1899
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5160 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 43/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 55/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C75 5G vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 47 points higher (89/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (97/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (93/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (80/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C75 5G is a bit better (50/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C75 5G | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 506757 | 3667711 | |
| Geekbench Single | 838 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1899 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.9" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 166 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 171.9×77.8×8.2 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 212 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Poco C75 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 5MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Poco C75 5G
- 6.9" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C75 5G
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C75 5G and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Poco C75 5G by 86.2% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco C75 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (97/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (89/100 vs 55/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (93/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G (80/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C75 5G is a bit better (50/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C75 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Poco C75 5G by 47 points (89/100 vs 42/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C75 5G and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Poco C75 5G has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C75 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C75 5G or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Poco C75 5G over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.