Poco C65 vs Vivo Y05
The Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo Y05 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7225; launch prices were $99 and $90. Both devices score the same overall rating of 33/100. Key differences: the Vivo Y05 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 8 MP; the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y05 doesn't; the Poco C65 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 209g).
Poco C65
Vivo Y05
- Faster charging: 18W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Lighter: 192g vs 209g
- Better camera (30/100 vs 10/100)
- Better portability (63/100 vs 49/100)
- Better Geekbench Single: 580 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1750 vs 1031
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Cheaper at launch: $90 vs $99
- Higher performance (31/100 vs 25/100)
- Longer battery life (53/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (55/100 vs 43/100)
The Poco C65 and the Vivo Y05 received the same MobileRank rating — 33/100. In the "camera" category, the Poco C65 leads (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y05 leads (53/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Poco C65 — 50/100, Vivo Y05 — 50/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y05 is a bit better (31/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo Y05 is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the Vivo Y05 (30/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y05 is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 49/100).
| Specification | Poco C65 | Vivo Y05 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Unisoc T7225 | |
| AnTuTu | 346495 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 375 | 580 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1031 | 1750 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13 / HyperOS | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | 167.4×77.1×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 209 g | |
| Launch price | $99 | $90 |
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y05
- Main: 8MP f/2.0
- Front: 5MP
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo Y05
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y05
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Launch price difference: $9. Vivo Y05 was $9 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo Y05 is a bit better (31/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y05 is a bit better (55/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco C65 notably outperforms the Vivo Y05 (30/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y05 is a bit better (53/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 49/100).
Which is better: the Poco C65 or the Vivo Y05?
Both devices scored 33/100. The choice depends on your priorities: if performance matters more — go with the Vivo Y05.
What is the rating of the Poco C65 and the Vivo Y05?
The Poco C65 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo Y05 — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C65 or the Vivo Y05?
The Poco C65 leads on camera score (30/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Poco C65 or the Vivo Y05?
The Vivo Y05 leads on performance (31/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Poco C65 over the Vivo Y05?
The Poco C65 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y05 is a better fit for everyday use.