Poco C61 vs Vivo X Fold6
The Poco C61 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G36, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 27/100 (a 61-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 195,539); the Vivo X Fold6 has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C61 doesn't; the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.3mm).
Poco C61
Vivo X Fold6
- Overall rating 27/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 195539
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 189
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 781
- Bigger battery: 6900 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 10W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 11/100)
- Longer battery life (82/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (100/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Poco C61 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 61 points higher (88/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 11/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (94/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (82/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (100/100 vs 56/100).
| Specification | Poco C61 | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G36 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 195539 | 3485039 | |
| Geekbench Single | 189 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 781 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB / 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MIUI | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 168.4×76.3×8.3 mm | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | $1900 |
Poco C61
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Poco C61
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C61
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Poco C61 and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X Fold6 leads Poco C61 by 94.4% in our overall performance rating.
Poco C61
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (94/100 vs 11/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (81/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (82/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (100/100 vs 56/100).
Which is better: the Poco C61 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Poco C61 by 61 points (88/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C61 and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Poco C61 has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco C61 or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 11/100).
Should you choose the Poco C61 over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Poco C61 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.