Poco C61 vs Vivo X300s
The Poco C61 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G36, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 27/100 (a 62-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 193,858); the Poco C61 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 217g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Poco C61
Vivo X300s
What makes Poco C61 better?
- Lighter: 199g vs 217g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 193858
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 189
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 781
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 11/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 44/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Poco C61 vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 62 points higher (89/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s leads (95/100 vs 11/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s leads (83/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (95/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (94/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (83/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C61 is a bit better (56/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Poco C61 | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G36 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 193858 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 189 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 781 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, MIUI | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | — | |
| Dimensions | 168.4×76.3×8.3 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | — | $723 |
Camera comparison
Poco C61
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Poco C61
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Poco C61
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Poco C61 and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads Poco C61 by 94.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco C61
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (95/100 vs 11/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (94/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (83/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C61 is a bit better (56/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Poco C61 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s significantly outperforms the Poco C61 by 62 points (89/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C61 and the Vivo X300s?
The Poco C61 has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco C61 or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 11/100).
Should you choose the Poco C61 over the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.