Poco C61 vs Vivo T2x
The Poco C61 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G36, while the Vivo T2x (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1300. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo T2x leads — 53/100 vs 27/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo T2x has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo T2x is faster in AnTuTu (954,090 vs 195,539); the Vivo T2x has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C61 doesn't.
Poco C61
Vivo T2x
- Lighter: 199g vs 202g
- Better portability (56/100 vs 45/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 954090 vs 195539
- Better Geekbench Single: 1114 vs 189
- Better Geekbench Multi: 3281 vs 781
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 44W vs 10W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (58/100 vs 11/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (76/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Poco C61 vs the Vivo T2x, the Vivo T2x scores 26 points higher (53/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo T2x leads (58/100 vs 11/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo T2x leads (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo T2x significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (58/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo T2x significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (76/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo T2x is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C61 is a bit better (56/100 vs 45/100).
| Specification | Poco C61 | Vivo T2x | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G36 | MediaTek Dimensity 1300 | |
| AnTuTu | 195539 | 954090 | |
| Geekbench Single | 189 | 1114 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 781 | 3281 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1080x2408 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 44W | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB / 6GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MIUI | Android 12, OriginOS 2.0 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | 650 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 168.4×76.3×8.3 mm | 163.9×75.3×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 202 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Poco C61
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Vivo T2x
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco C61
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo T2x
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2408
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco C61
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo T2x
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco C61 and Vivo T2x, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo T2x leads Poco C61 by 79.5% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo T2x significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (58/100 vs 11/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo T2x significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (76/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo T2x is a bit better (56/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C61 is a bit better (56/100 vs 45/100).
Which is better: the Poco C61 or the Vivo T2x?
The Vivo T2x significantly outperforms the Poco C61 by 26 points (53/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C61 and the Vivo T2x?
The Poco C61 has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo T2x — 53/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco C61 or the Vivo T2x?
The Vivo T2x leads on performance (58/100 vs 11/100).
Should you choose the Poco C61 over the Vivo T2x?
The Poco C61 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo T2x is a better fit for everyday use.