Poco C61 vs Vivo T2 Pro
The Poco C61 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Helio G36, while the Vivo T2 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo T2 Pro leads — 54/100 vs 27/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C61 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the Vivo T2 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (971,424 vs 195,539); the Vivo T2 Pro is noticeably lighter (175g vs 199g).
Poco C61
Vivo T2 Pro
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Overall rating 27/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 971424 vs 195539
- Better Geekbench Single: 1167 vs 189
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2577 vs 781
- Faster charging: 66W vs 10W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 175g vs 199g
- Higher performance (57/100 vs 11/100)
- Longer battery life (44/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 44/100)
- Better portability (80/100 vs 56/100)
Comparing the Poco C61 vs the Vivo T2 Pro, the Vivo T2 Pro scores 27 points higher (54/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo T2 Pro leads (57/100 vs 11/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo T2 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (57/100 vs 11/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo T2 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (79/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo T2 Pro and the Poco C61 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo T2 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C61 (80/100 vs 56/100).
| Specification | Poco C61 | Vivo T2 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G36 | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | |
| AnTuTu | 195539 | 971424 | |
| Geekbench Single | 189 | 1167 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 781 | 2577 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 66W | |
| Main camera | — | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB / 6GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MIUI | Android 13, Funtouch 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 168.4×76.3×8.3 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 175 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Poco C61
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Vivo T2 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco C61
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo T2 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C61
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo T2 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
We compared Poco C61 and Vivo T2 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo T2 Pro leads Poco C61 by 79.9% in our overall performance rating.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo T2 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (57/100 vs 11/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo T2 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C61 (79/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo T2 Pro and the Poco C61 are nearly equal (44/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo T2 Pro notably outperforms the Poco C61 (80/100 vs 56/100).
Which is better: the Poco C61 or the Vivo T2 Pro?
The Vivo T2 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C61 by 27 points (54/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C61 and the Vivo T2 Pro?
The Poco C61 has a MobileRank rating of 27/100, the Vivo T2 Pro — 54/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco C61 or the Vivo T2 Pro?
The Vivo T2 Pro leads on performance (57/100 vs 11/100).
Should you choose the Poco C61 over the Vivo T2 Pro?
The Poco C61 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo T2 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.