Poco C50 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Poco C50 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio A22, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 26/100 (a 61-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 155,362); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco C50 doesn't; the Poco C50 is noticeably lighter (192g vs 226g).
Poco C50
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 192g vs 226g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 155362
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 300
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 486
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 10W
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Poco C50 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 61 points higher (87/100 vs 26/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C50 (93/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C50 (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C50 (81/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C50 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Poco C50 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio A22 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 155362 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 300 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 486 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 10W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB / 3GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12 (Go edition) | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.9×76.8×9.1 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 192 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Poco C50
- Main: —
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Poco C50
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C50
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 10W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Poco C50 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Poco C50 by 95.2% in our overall performance rating.
Poco C50
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C50 (93/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C50 (84/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C50 (81/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Poco C50 is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Poco C50 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Poco C50 by 61 points (87/100 vs 26/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C50 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Poco C50 has a MobileRank rating of 26/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which is more powerful: the Poco C50 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Poco C50 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Poco C50 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.