Poco C40 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
The Poco C40 (2022) runs on the JLQ, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads — 71/100 vs 31/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C40 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 64 MP.
Poco C40
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Overall rating 31/100
- Faster charging: 80W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (86/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Poco C40 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition scores 40 points higher (71/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (80/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (86/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Poco C40 | ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | JLQ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1290942 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1675 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 4453 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1116x2480 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 64 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 12GB / 18GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm | 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 204 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Poco C40
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 64MP
- Telephoto: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco C40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1116x2480
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C40
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (80/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (86/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Poco C40 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition significantly outperforms the Poco C40 by 40 points (71/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C40 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Poco C40 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C40 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Poco C40 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?
The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.