Poco C40 vs ZTE Axon 40 pro
The Poco C40 (2022) runs on the JLQ, while the ZTE Axon 40 pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads — 58/100 vs 31/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C40 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 108 MP.
Poco C40
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Overall rating 31/100
- Faster charging: 65W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 199g vs 204g
- Better camera (44/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 39/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Poco C40 vs the ZTE Axon 40 pro, the ZTE Axon 40 pro scores 27 points higher (58/100 vs 31/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro leads (44/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (89/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (44/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Poco C40 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Poco C40 | ZTE Axon 40 pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | JLQ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 12, MyOS 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 1000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm | 162.9×72.9×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 199 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Poco C40
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Poco C40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco C40
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40 pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (89/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (44/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro and the Poco C40 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Axon 40 pro is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Poco C40 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro significantly outperforms the Poco C40 by 27 points (58/100 vs 31/100).
What is the rating of the Poco C40 and the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Poco C40 has a MobileRank rating of 31/100, the ZTE Axon 40 pro — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C40 or the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The ZTE Axon 40 pro leads on camera score (44/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Poco C40 over the ZTE Axon 40 pro?
The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Axon 40 pro is a better fit for active users.