Poco C40 vs Vivo Y05
The Poco C40 (2022) runs on the JLQ, while the Vivo Y05 (2026) runs on the Unisoc T7225. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y05 leads — 26/100 vs 11/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y05 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 8 MP; the Poco C40 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y05 doesn't.
Poco C40
Vivo Y05
- Faster charging: 18W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 8MP
- Lighter: 204g vs 209g
- Better design/ergonomics (45/100 vs 38/100)
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Longer battery life (48/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Poco C40 vs the Vivo Y05, the Vivo Y05 scores 15 points higher (26/100 vs 11/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y05 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo Y05 significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y05 and the Poco C40 are nearly equal (48/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Poco C40 is a bit better (45/100 vs 38/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y05 significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco C40 | Vivo Y05 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | JLQ | Unisoc T7225 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 300000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 580 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1750 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | 1200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm | 167.4×77.1×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 209 g | |
| Price | — | $90 |
Poco C40
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y05
- Main: 8MP f/2.0
- Front: 5MP
Poco C40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y05
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C40
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y05
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
Poco C40
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo Y05 significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y05 and the Poco C40 are nearly equal (48/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Poco C40 is a bit better (45/100 vs 38/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y05 significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco C40 or the Vivo Y05?
The Vivo Y05 is noticeably better than the Poco C40 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Poco C40 and the Vivo Y05?
The Poco C40 has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the Vivo Y05 — 26/100.
Should you choose the Poco C40 over the Vivo Y05?
The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y05 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.