Poco C40 vs Samsung Galaxy M07
The Poco C40 (2022) runs on the JLQ, while the Samsung Galaxy M07 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy M07 leads — 26/100 vs 11/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C40 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 13 MP vs 50 MP; the Poco C40 has NFC for contactless payments, the Samsung Galaxy M07 doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy M07 is noticeably lighter (184g vs 204g).
Poco C40
Samsung Galaxy M07
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 37/100)
- Faster charging: 25W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 184g vs 204g
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (70/100 vs 45/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Poco C40 vs the Samsung Galaxy M07, the Samsung Galaxy M07 scores 15 points higher (26/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 notably outperforms the Poco C40 (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C40 is a bit better (45/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 notably outperforms the Poco C40 (70/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Poco C40 | Samsung Galaxy M07 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | JLQ | MediaTek Helio G99 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 408000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 760 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1890 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 6.7" PLS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1650 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 25W | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 3GB / 4GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 32GB / 64GB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | Android 15, up to 6 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm | 167.4×77.4×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 204 g | 184 g | |
| Price | — | $113 |
Poco C40
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy M07
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Poco C40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy M07
- 6.7" PLS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Poco C40
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy M07
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- No wireless charging
Poco C40
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 notably outperforms the Poco C40 (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C40 is a bit better (45/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 notably outperforms the Poco C40 (70/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy M07 significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Poco C40 or the Samsung Galaxy M07?
The Samsung Galaxy M07 is noticeably better than the Poco C40 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Poco C40 and the Samsung Galaxy M07?
The Poco C40 has a MobileRank rating of 11/100, the Samsung Galaxy M07 — 26/100.
Which has the better camera: the Poco C40 or the Samsung Galaxy M07?
The Samsung Galaxy M07 leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Poco C40 over the Samsung Galaxy M07?
The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy M07 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.