Philips S7221 5G vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Philips S7221 5G (2026) runs on the Unisoc T8200, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 44/100 (a 47-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5700); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Philips S7221 5G is noticeably lighter (210g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Philips S7221 5G by 47 points (91/100 vs 44/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Philips S7221 5G

Performance 40
Display 55
Camera 40
Battery 50
Portability 42
Value for money —

Vivo X300 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94

What makes Philips S7221 5G better?

  • Lighter: 210g vs 230g

  • Better portability (42/100 vs 39/100)

What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?

  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 750
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2200
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5700 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 40/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 50/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 55/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Philips S7221 5G vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 47 points higher (91/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 40/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Philips S7221 5G (99/100 vs 40/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Philips S7221 5G (89/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Philips S7221 5G (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Philips S7221 5G (85/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Philips S7221 5G and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Philips S7221 5G Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Unisoc T8200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu — 4247433
Geekbench Single 750 3639
Geekbench Multi 2200 11047
Display 6.7" IPS LCD 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 720x1600 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5700 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) — 170
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 4GB / 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 16
NFC — yes
Protection IP64 IP69
Dimensions 166.0×77.0×9.0 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 210 g 230 g
Launch price — $950

Camera comparison

Philips S7221 5G

  • Main: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
40
camera

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • Main: 200MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera

Display comparison

Philips S7221 5G

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1600
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
55
display

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Philips S7221 5G

  • 5700 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • No wireless charging
50
battery

Vivo X300 Ultra

  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Philips S7221 5G

Price unknown

Vivo X300 Ultra

$950

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Philips S7221 5G (99/100 vs 40/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Philips S7221 5G (89/100 vs 55/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Philips S7221 5G (96/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Philips S7221 5G (85/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Philips S7221 5G and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (42/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Philips S7221 5G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Philips S7221 5G by 47 points (91/100 vs 44/100).

What is the rating of the Philips S7221 5G and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Philips S7221 5G has a MobileRank rating of 44/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Philips S7221 5G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Philips S7221 5G or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 40/100).

Should you choose the Philips S7221 5G over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.