Oppo Reno7 Lite vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Oppo Reno7 Lite (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 50/100 (a 41-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 592,015); the Oppo Reno7 Lite is noticeably lighter (173g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno7 Lite
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Oppo Reno7 Lite better?
- Lighter: 173g vs 230g
- Better portability (80/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 592015
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 905
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2101
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 35/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno7 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 41 points higher (91/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 Lite (99/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 Lite (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 Lite (85/100 vs 35/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno7 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (80/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno7 Lite | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 592015 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 905 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2101 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.4" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11, ColorOS 12 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX4 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 159.9×73.2×7.5 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 173 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- Main: 64MP f/1.7
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- 6.4" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno7 Lite
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno7 Lite and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Oppo Reno7 Lite by 86.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno7 Lite
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 Lite (99/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 Lite (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 Lite (85/100 vs 35/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno7 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (80/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno7 Lite by 41 points (91/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno7 Lite and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno7 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno7 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno7 Lite over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.