OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 83/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,120,347).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno17 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Overall rating 83/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2120347
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6405
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 77/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 94/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 83/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 8 points higher (91/100 vs 83/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 77/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2120347 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69K | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | — | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno17 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno17 Pro (China)
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno17 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) by 50.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
OPPO Reno17 Pro (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 77/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) are nearly equal (96/100 vs 94/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) are nearly equal (85/100 vs 83/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 77/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno17 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.