Oppo Reno16 vs Vivo X300 Pro

The Oppo Reno16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 72/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Oppo Reno16 has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,282,176); the Oppo Reno16 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno16 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno16
Performance 65
Display 85
Camera 81
Battery 66
Portability 64
Value for money
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
What makes Oppo Reno16 better?
  • Bigger battery: 6700 vs 6510 mAh
  • Lighter: 188g vs 226g

  • Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1282176
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1270
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4106
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 81/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Oppo Reno16 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 15 points higher (87/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 (93/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno16 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 (96/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (64/100 vs 43/100).

Oppo Reno16: The Oppo Reno16 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Oppo Reno16 Vivo X300 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 1282176 3269794
Geekbench Single 1270 3228
Geekbench Multi 4106 9553
Display 6.3" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1216x2640 1260x2800
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6700 mAh 6510 mAh
Charging 80W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 171
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 50 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16, ColorOS 16 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm
Weight 188 g 226 g
Launch price $899
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno16
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Oppo Reno16
  • 6.3" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno16
  • 6700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Oppo Reno16 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Oppo Reno16 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
72/100
1282176 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100 +60.8%
3269794 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Oppo Reno16 by 60.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno16
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Pro
$899
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 (93/100 vs 65/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno16 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 (96/100 vs 81/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Oppo Reno16 (81/100 vs 66/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno16 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (64/100 vs 43/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Oppo Reno16 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Oppo Reno16 and the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Oppo Reno16 has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 81/100).

Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno16 or the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 65/100).

Should you choose the Oppo Reno16 over the Vivo X300 Pro?

The Oppo Reno16 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.