OPPO Reno16 Pro vs ZTE Axon 40

The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads — 83/100 vs 58/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 1,010,069).

The OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 by 25 points (83/100 vs 58/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

OPPO Reno16 Pro

Performance 82
Display 95
Camera 94
Battery 66
Portability 64
Value for money 80

ZTE Axon 40

Performance 61
Display 73
Camera 51
Battery 52
Portability 53
Value for money —

What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 1010069
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1555 vs 1298
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6405 vs 3520
  • Bigger battery: 6700 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 188g vs 200g

  • Higher performance (82/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better camera (94/100 vs 51/100)
  • Longer battery life (66/100 vs 52/100)
  • Better display (95/100 vs 73/100)
  • Better portability (64/100 vs 53/100)

What makes ZTE Axon 40 better?


  • Overall rating 58/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the ZTE Axon 40, the OPPO Reno16 Pro scores 25 points higher (83/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (82/100 vs 61/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro leads (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (82/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (95/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (94/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 53/100).

OPPO Reno16 Pro: The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
ZTE Axon 40: The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification OPPO Reno16 Pro ZTE Axon 40
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
AnTuTu 3079298 1010069
Geekbench Single 1555 1298
Geekbench Multi 6405 3520
Display 6.3" AMOLED 6.7"
Resolution 1216x2640 1080x2400
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6700 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 80W —
Main camera 200 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 50 MP 44 MP
RAM 12GB —
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB
OS Android 16 Android 12 Snow Cone
Brightness (peak) 3600 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 —
Dimensions 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm
Weight 188 g 200 g
Launch price $600 —

Camera comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • Main: 200MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
94
camera

ZTE Axon 40

  • Main: 64MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 44MP
51
camera

Display comparison

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6.3" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1216x2640
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
95
display

ZTE Axon 40

  • 6.7"
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
73
display

Battery and charging

OPPO Reno16 Pro

  • 6700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
66
battery

ZTE Axon 40

  • 5000 mAh
  • No wireless charging
52
battery

Overall performance score

We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

OPPO Reno16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super
83/100
3079298 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
58/100 -204.9%
1010069 AnTuTu

OPPO Reno16 Pro leads ZTE Axon 40 by 204.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

OPPO Reno16 Pro

$600

ZTE Axon 40

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (82/100 vs 61/100).

display

In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (95/100 vs 73/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 (94/100 vs 51/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (64/100 vs 53/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 by 25 points (83/100 vs 58/100).

What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the ZTE Axon 40?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 51/100).

Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the ZTE Axon 40?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro leads on performance (82/100 vs 61/100).

Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the ZTE Axon 40?

The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.