OPPO Reno16 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $600 and $889. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 83/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro has the bigger battery (6700 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 3,079,298); the OPPO Reno16 Pro is noticeably lighter (188g vs 229g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6700 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 188g vs 229g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $889
- Better camera (94/100 vs 93/100)
- Better display (95/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 34/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 3079298
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 6405
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 82/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 66/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 3 points higher (86/100 vs 83/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 82/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 66/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro — 80/100, Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 82/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (64/100 vs 34/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8550 Super | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3079298 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1555 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6405 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.3" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6700 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 188 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | $600 | $889 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6.3" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro
- 6700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads OPPO Reno16 Pro by 0.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $289. OPPO Reno16 Pro was $289 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (92/100 vs 82/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra are nearly equal (94/100 vs 93/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X200 Ultra (64/100 vs 34/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra edges out the OPPO Reno16 Pro by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 83/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 82/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.