OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $661 and $700. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads — 87/100 vs 73/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,032,039 vs 1,757,044); the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is thinner (7.7mm vs 9.1mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3032039 vs 1757044
- Better Geekbench Single: 2725 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8932 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $700
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 63/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 30/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 60 Ultra better?
- Overall rating 73/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) scores 14 points higher (87/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads (83/100 vs 63/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (83/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (59/100 vs 30/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | ZTE Axon 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 1757044 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 2004 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 5311 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | 163.6×76.0×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 205 g | — | |
| Launch price | $661 | $700 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
ZTE Axon 60 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and ZTE Axon 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads ZTE Axon 60 Ultra by 72.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $39. OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) was $39 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a bit better (90/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (94/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (83/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra (59/100 vs 30/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra — 73/100.
Which has the better camera: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on camera score (94/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) leads on performance (90/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the ZTE Axon 60 Ultra?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users.