OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300s
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s, while the Vivo X300s (2026) runs on the Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $661 and $723. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300s leads — 89/100 vs 87/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300s has the bigger battery (7100 mAh vs 7000); the Vivo X300s is faster in AnTuTu (3,703,823 vs 3,032,039).
Profile comparison
Category scores
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
Vivo X300s
What makes OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Lighter: 205g vs 217g
- Cheaper at launch: $661 vs $723
- Better portability (59/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo X300s better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3703823 vs 3032039
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2725
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 8932
- Bigger battery: 7100 vs 7000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (95/100 vs 90/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300s, the Vivo X300s scores 2 points higher (89/100 vs 87/100). Value score: OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) — 88/100, Vivo X300s — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100. In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 83/100. In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (59/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) | Vivo X300s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3032039 | 3703823 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2725 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8932 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2772x1272 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 7100 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / OriginOS 6 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.3×76.4×7.7 mm | — | |
| Weight | 205 g | 217 g | |
| Launch price | $661 | $723 |
Camera comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300s
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300s
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
OPPO Reno16 Pro (China)
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300s
- 7100 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and Vivo X300s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300s leads OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by 18.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $62. OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) was $62 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (95/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300s is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, both devices are on the same level — 83/100.
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300s (59/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s edges out the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300s?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Vivo X300s — 89/100.
Which is more powerful: the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300s?
The Vivo X300s leads on performance (95/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300s?
The OPPO Reno16 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300s is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.