Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 62/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,240,821); the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (186g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) better?
- Lighter: 186g vs 230g
- Better portability (71/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1240821
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1239
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3962
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4600 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 64/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 54/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 51/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 29 points higher (91/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 54/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (71/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1240821 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1239 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3962 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1240x2772 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 32 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×74.0×7.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 32MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1240x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) by 70.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 64/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 54/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) (85/100 vs 51/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (71/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) by 29 points (91/100 vs 62/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 54/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 64/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.