Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) vs Vivo S17 Pro
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200, while the Vivo S17 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) leads — 62/100 vs 60/100 (a 2-point difference).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
Vivo S17 Pro
What makes Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Lighter: 186g vs 188g
- Better camera (54/100 vs 48/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 47/100)
What makes Vivo S17 Pro better?
- Better portability (72/100 vs 71/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) vs the Vivo S17 Pro, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) scores 2 points higher (62/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 64/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) is a bit better (54/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) and the Vivo S17 Pro are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S17 Pro and the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) are nearly equal (72/100 vs 71/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) | Vivo S17 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | |
| AnTuTu | 1240821 | 1240821 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1239 | 1239 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3962 | 3962 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1240x2772 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 32 MP | 12 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, OriginOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×74.0×7.7 mm | 164.2×74.4×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 32MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo S17 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 12MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1240x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S17 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo S17 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) and Vivo S17 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 64/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) is a bit better (54/100 vs 48/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) and the Vivo S17 Pro are nearly equal (51/100 vs 47/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S17 Pro and the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) are nearly equal (72/100 vs 71/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) or the Vivo S17 Pro?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) edges out the Vivo S17 Pro by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) and the Vivo S17 Pro?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo S17 Pro — 60/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) or the Vivo S17 Pro?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) leads on camera score (54/100 vs 48/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) over the Vivo S17 Pro?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo S17 Pro is a better fit for active users.