Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) vs Vivo S16 Pro
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200, while the Vivo S16 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) leads — 62/100 vs 58/100 (a 4-point difference).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
Vivo S16 Pro
What makes Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) better?
- Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
- Better camera (54/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Vivo S16 Pro better?
- Lighter: 182g vs 186g
- Better portability (76/100 vs 71/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) vs the Vivo S16 Pro, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) scores 4 points higher (62/100 vs 58/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) leads (54/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 64/100. In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) is a bit better (54/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16 Pro is a bit better (76/100 vs 71/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) | Vivo S16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | |
| AnTuTu | 1240821 | 1240821 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1239 | 1239 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3962 | 3962 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1240x2772 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 66W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 32 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, ColorOS 14 | Android 13, Origin OS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×74.0×7.7 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 186 g | 182 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 32MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo S16 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1240x2772
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno10 Pro (China)
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
Vivo S16 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) and Vivo S16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 64/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) is a bit better (84/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) is a bit better (54/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) is a bit better (51/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16 Pro is a bit better (76/100 vs 71/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) or the Vivo S16 Pro?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) edges out the Vivo S16 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) and the Vivo S16 Pro?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 62/100, the Vivo S16 Pro — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) or the Vivo S16 Pro?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) leads on camera score (54/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) over the Vivo S16 Pro?
The Oppo Reno10 Pro (China) is a better fit for active users. The Vivo S16 Pro is a better fit for active users.