Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE vs Vivo S16 Pro
The Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200, while the Vivo S16 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE leads — 59/100 vs 57/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo S16 Pro is thinner (7.4mm vs 8.6mm).
Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE
Vivo S16 Pro
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Longer battery life (64/100 vs 44/100)
- Lighter: 182g vs 193g
- Better camera (44/100 vs 40/100)
- Better portability (76/100 vs 57/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE vs the Vivo S16 Pro, the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE scores 2 points higher (59/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE leads (64/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 62/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE notably outperforms the Vivo S16 Pro (64/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE (76/100 vs 57/100).
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE | Vivo S16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | MediaTek Dimensity 8200 | |
| AnTuTu | 1221748 | 1221748 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1230 | 1230 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3297 | 3297 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4600 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 66W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, Origin OS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 164.8×76.9×8.6 mm | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 182 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo S16 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo S16 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE and Vivo S16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 62/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 79/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo S16 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE are nearly equal (44/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE notably outperforms the Vivo S16 Pro (64/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE (76/100 vs 57/100).
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE or the Vivo S16 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE edges out the Vivo S16 Pro by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE and the Vivo S16 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Vivo S16 Pro — 57/100.
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE over the Vivo S16 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE is a better fit for active users. The Vivo S16 Pro is a better fit for active users.