Oppo Reno Ace vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Oppo Reno Ace (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 49/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 859,084); the Oppo Reno Ace is noticeably lighter (200g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno Ace
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Oppo Reno Ace better?
- Lighter: 200g vs 230g
- Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 859084
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1031
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2864
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 65W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Oppo Reno Ace vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 42 points higher (91/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (99/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (89/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (85/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno Ace is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Oppo Reno Ace | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 859084 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1031 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2864 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.5" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 65W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 13 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10.0; ColorOS 6.1 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×75.7×8.7 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 200 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno Ace
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 13MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Oppo Reno Ace
- 6.5" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno Ace
- 4000 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Oppo Reno Ace and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Oppo Reno Ace by 79.8% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno Ace
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (99/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (89/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (85/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno Ace is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace by 42 points (91/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Oppo Reno Ace and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Oppo Reno Ace has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Oppo Reno Ace over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.