Oppo Reno Ace vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra

The Oppo Reno Ace (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads — 79/100 vs 49/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 859,084); the Oppo Reno Ace is noticeably lighter (200g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace by 30 points (79/100 vs 49/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno Ace
Performance 55
Display 68
Camera 40
Battery 32
Portability 52
Value for money
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Performance 98
Display 78
Camera 67
Battery 61
Portability 66
Value for money 62
What makes Oppo Reno Ace better?
  • Faster charging: 65W vs 60W
  • Lighter: 200g vs 215g

  • Overall rating 49/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 859084
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1031
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2864
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (67/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better display (78/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 52/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Oppo Reno Ace vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 30 points higher (79/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (67/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (98/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (67/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (61/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

Oppo Reno Ace: The Oppo Reno Ace is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Oppo Reno Ace Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 859084 3942923
Geekbench Single 1031 3640
Geekbench Multi 2864 11033
Display 6.5" AMOLED 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2400 1968x2184
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 65W 60W
Wireless charging 0W 25W
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 13 MP 10 MP
Front camera 16 MP 10 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10.0; ColorOS 6.1 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48
Dimensions 161.0×75.7×8.7 mm
Weight 200 g 215 g
Launch price $2199
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno Ace
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 13MP
  • Front: 16MP
40
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera
Display comparison
Oppo Reno Ace
  • 6.5" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
68
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
  • 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1968x2184
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno Ace
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • No wireless charging
32
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Oppo Reno Ace and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Oppo Reno Ace Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+
49/100
859084 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
79/100 +78.2%
3942923 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads Oppo Reno Ace by 78.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno Ace
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
$2199
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (98/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (78/100 vs 68/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (67/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (61/100 vs 32/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace by 30 points (79/100 vs 49/100).

What is the rating of the Oppo Reno Ace and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Oppo Reno Ace has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 79/100.

Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on camera score (67/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Oppo Reno Ace over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra?

The Oppo Reno Ace is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.