Oppo Reno Ace vs Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra

The Oppo Reno Ace (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, while the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads — 84/100 vs 49/100 (a 35-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,515,964 vs 859,084).

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace by 35 points (84/100 vs 49/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Oppo Reno Ace
Performance 55
Display 68
Camera 40
Battery 32
Portability 52
Value for money
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Performance 96
Display 88
Camera 86
Battery 61
Portability 51
Value for money 76
What makes Oppo Reno Ace better?
  • Faster charging: 65W vs 60W
  • Lighter: 200g vs 214g

  • Better portability (52/100 vs 51/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3515964 vs 859084
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3601 vs 1031
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10686 vs 2864
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (61/100 vs 32/100)
  • Better display (88/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Oppo Reno Ace vs the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra scores 35 points higher (84/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads (61/100 vs 32/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (88/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (86/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (61/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno Ace and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).

Oppo Reno Ace: The Oppo Reno Ace is a better fit for everyday use.
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Oppo Reno Ace Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 859084 3515964
Geekbench Single 1031 3601
Geekbench Multi 2864 10686
Display 6.5" AMOLED 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2400 3120x1440
Refresh rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 65W 60W
Wireless charging 0W 25W
DXOMark (camera) 157
Main camera 48 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 13 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 12 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9.0 (Pie), planned upgrade to Android 10.0; ColorOS 6.1 Android 16 / One UI 8.5
Brightness (peak) 500 nits 2600 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 161.0×75.7×8.7 mm 163.6×78.1×7.9 mm
Weight 200 g 214 g
Launch price $1299
Camera comparison
Oppo Reno Ace
  • Main: 48MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 13MP
  • Front: 16MP
40
camera
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 12MP
86
camera
Display comparison
Oppo Reno Ace
  • 6.5" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
68
display
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 3120x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
88
display
Battery and charging
Oppo Reno Ace
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • No wireless charging
32
battery
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:12 hrs, total 28:50 hrs
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Oppo Reno Ace and Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Oppo Reno Ace Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+
49/100
859084 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
84/100 +75.6%
3515964 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads Oppo Reno Ace by 75.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Oppo Reno Ace
Price unknown
Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra
$1299
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (96/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (88/100 vs 68/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (86/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra notably outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace (61/100 vs 32/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Oppo Reno Ace and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra are nearly equal (52/100 vs 51/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra significantly outperforms the Oppo Reno Ace by 35 points (84/100 vs 49/100).

What is the rating of the Oppo Reno Ace and the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Oppo Reno Ace has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra — 84/100.

Which has the better camera: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Oppo Reno Ace or the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra leads on performance (96/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Oppo Reno Ace over the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra?

The Oppo Reno Ace is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, budget-conscious buyers.